Ultrasound Daily Digest Mon, 8 Feb 93 Volume 2 : Issue 36 Today's Topics: comanche DRAM problems Gus Memory (100ns or 70ns?) Links386 & SBOS Speaker out -> Line In Question Speakers Starcon 2 mod problem Tired of Techno... What ever happened to... Information about the UltraSound Daily Digest (such as mail addresses, request servers, ftp sites, etc., etc.) can be found at the end of the Digest. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1993 15:08:20 +0000 (GMT) From: Dave Ingles Message-Id: <11611.9302071508@central1.lancaster.ac.uk> Subject: comanche To: Ultrasound Daily Digest > I've been noticing that people have been having problems with > getting the digitized sound to work. > > I've got a 256K GUS, with a 386-40, and SBOS 1.23, and it has > always worked flawlessly. I think it worked fine with 1.22 also. > > Install the patch, reconfigure the sound by running comanche's > SOUNDSET.EXE, reboot with just HIMEM and the GUS settings, and > run SBOS with no options. Works for me! > > Have Fun. > Eric A. Hobbs > ehobbs@jupiter.nmt.edu Perhaps you could tell us which options you used after executing soundset.com ? Also what does your comanche.cfg file contain after configuration ? Davei -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> D.Ingles@uk.ac.lancaster << >> Telephone (0524) 59 3679 << >> Higher Education National Software Archive, << >> Computer Centre, The University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, United Kingdom << -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Feb 93 09:55:51 -0500 From: bli@hubcap.clemson.edu (Bao Li) Message-Id: <9302071455.AA28702@hubcap.clemson.edu> Subject: DRAM problems To: Ultrasound Daily Digest >In Ultrasound Digest #33 v2 ptran@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca (Phat Tran) writes: >>Gravis first shipped the GUS with 100ns DRAMs, but then started shipping >>boards with 70ns chips. This leads me to suspect that 100ns is not >>fast enough. > >I too have been having trouble with DRAM. When I upgraded, I removed the >original 100ns chips and installed 8 70ns chips. After that, only the >mididemo and flidemo worked. SBOS does not work at all. Crashes every time. >When I called Gravis, they said that it shouldn't make any difference what >speed I used and that I better ship the card back to them for warranty repair. >I have to wonder why they would have used 100ns chips in the first place if >it didn't matter. Are 100ns cheaper for them? I for one have had great >difficulty locating shops that still stock 100ns. They look at you kinda >funny when you ask for it! >I also had inconsistent reports from the DRAM tester but then again it is a >beta release isn't it. :-) > > >Kevin Holly I upgraded my GUS to 1 MB with 8 60ns chips. So far, there is no problem. Everything is fine. Bao ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Feb 93 10:08:38 PST From: aktang@sdcc13.UCSD.EDU (I should be studying) Message-Id: <9302071808.AA22437@sdcc13.UCSD.EDU> Subject: Gus Memory (100ns or 70ns?) To: Ultrasound Daily Digest My GUS came with 70ns chips, and I filled it to 1MB using 4 100ns chips, 1 70ns chip, and 1 80ns chip. (Yeh, I know, weird, but I got a good deal). Anyway, I've been having no problems at all with this configuration. The DRAM tester says all's well. I doubt it matters too much. -Anthony Tang aktang@sdcc13.ucsd.edu ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Feb 93 11:33:06 EST From: elewis@eve.wright.edu (Edward Lewis IV) Message-Id: <9302071633.AA29324@eve.wright.edu.> Subject: Links386 & SBOS To: Ultrasound Daily Digest Lee Bollard Writes.. >From: Lee Bollard >Subject: Links386Pro & SBOS? >I've tried to get Links386Pro (ver 1.07) to work with SBOS but >haven't had any luck. I've tried SBOS 1.20 and 1.22, and virtually >all the option settings. >I'd like to hear from others who have made Links386Pro work with >their GUS cards. Maybe they could suggest something I haven't tried. To get Links386 to work with SBOS you must do the following: Boot up with no Expanded memmory Mangagers (eg EMM386) (This is important) Delete the LINKS386.CFG file from your links386 Directory use SBOS -x2 type GOLF /S to run links386 Go into sound set-up and choose SoundBlaster NOTE:You must have version 1.05 or higher for this to work (which you do) This should work with SBOS v1.20 or 1.22 You should now be able to choose Soundblaster. Many people say you must disable BACKGROUND sounds or it will lock up the game, but I have not had this problem myself. You may also want to use IRQ 5 or 7 if free as that is the normal SoundBlaster IRQ defaults. If this for some reason does not work. E-mail me and We'll see if we can figure it out. Good Luck. Ed Lewis elewis@eve.wright.edu Wright State University - Dayton, Ohio ------------------------------ Date: 06 Feb 1993 23:02:35 -0500 From: "Bryon Daly, ECE Dept, UMass, Amherst" Message-Id: <01GUF28J6L5E8WW9HY@UMAECS> Subject: Speaker out -> Line In Question To: Ultrasound Daily Digest I'd like to be able to sample output from my stereo on my GUS. The problem is that my cheap stereo has no Line-Out's. All it has is two sets of speaker-outs (A & B). Previously (thanks, Francois!), I have been warned of the dangers of connecting that output (SPEAKER-B) to the GUS's line in. I am aware of and able to eliminate the feedback problem, but I am concerned about the difference in output and input levels, etc between the speaker out and the line in. Would it be enough just to play the stereo out at a very low volume while recording, or are impedance, etc problems still too big a concern even then? If it is still a problem, is there any simple (ie: cheap) hardware solution to fix up this mismatch and make things acceptable for recording? Thanks, -Bryon ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Feb 93 22:57:48 EST From: tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu Message-Id: <9302080357.AA09878@c00100-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu> Subject: Speakers To: Ultrasound Daily Digest Concerning speakers, I found a great pair of JBL's at Circuit City. They go on sale very often for about $49-$59 a pair. They are bookshelf-size bass-reflex speakers with 1" titanium tweeters and 5 1/4" coated woofers. They sound great. Especially when you have them hooked to a stereo with a 12" subwoofer! I compared them in CC to a pair of Bose 301's. The sound was ten times clearer, and they were cheaper to boot! Send replies to: | My opinions do not represent tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu | anyone who does not feel the creek-tm@aza.csc.ncsu.edu | same way about it as I do. ------------------------------ Date: 06 Feb 1993 23:19:56 -0500 From: "Bryon Daly, ECE Dept, UMass, Amherst" Message-Id: <01GUF2UKJRBC8WW9HY@UMAECS> Subject: Starcon 2 mod problem To: Ultrasound Daily Digest Hello, I have used a program I got from wuarchive to extract the mod files from Star Control 2 (I love the music in it). The problem is that a bunch of the mods don't quite sound right, or are messed up somewhat. (Especially ur-quan.mod and the intro, some of my favorite ones). I've tried playing them in GUSMOD, trakblaster, and modedit, and they don't work right in any of them. I saw one post in the ibm.pc.games newsgroup stating that this was due to some slight irregularity in certain mods which causes many mod players to mis-play them (including GUSMOD & many others). He said that the cause was something like this: The samples are in order: 11112222233333.... and the mod players for some reason interpret this as sample 1: 11112 sample 2: 22223 sample 3: 33334 or something like that, anyway. This would explain the hissing noises I get in the ur-quan mod. But then someone else posted that all the mods from Starcon 2 worked fine for them using GUSMOD. So my question is: what's the story? Is the above reasoning BS, or is it true? Does anyone know how to get all the SC2 mods to play correctly? Any answers/explanations would be appreciated, Thanks, -Bryon ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1993 00:50:18 -0700 (MST) From: michael a finkel Message-Id: Subject: Tired of Techno... To: Ultrasound Daily Digest Well, the trend of .MOD's, .MID's, and .669's seems to be techno. I am sick of this.. I have many files of merely repeated rhythm segments. Do any of you have any (or know where to get) titles of good Industrial, Metal, Punk, or Rock music files (mod,669, or mid)? I would really like to know... Thanks | | Tell me something I don't know | | MFinkel@Gas.uug.Arizona.edu | Show me something I can use | | =----> Tucson, Arizona | CONNECT THE GOD DAMN DOTS | | | -=Ministry=- | ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1993 00:47:51 -0700 (MST) From: michael a finkel Message-Id: Subject: What ever happened to... To: Ultrasound Daily Digest I was curious about the reply card I sent in to Gravis quite a long time ago... I have never heard any kind of acknowledgement that they recieved it. I have heard much talk about getting the new patch set, the new sbos, the package offers etc... Shouldn't I have recieved something from them in the mail about this? Just a concern... | | Tell me something I don't know | | MFinkel@Gas.uug.Arizona.edu | Show me something I can use | | =----> Tucson, Arizona | CONNECT THE GOD DAMN DOTS | | | -=Ministry=- | ------------------------------ End of Ultrasound Daily Digest V2 #36 ******************************